From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | PostgresSQL General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
Date: | 2002-08-12 15:30:36 |
Message-ID: | 20020812113036.I17166@mail.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:15:46AM -0500, Greg Copeland wrote:
> If by "turn...on", you mean recompile, that's a horrible idea IMO.
Ah. Well, that is what I meant. Why is it horrible? PostgreSQL
doesn't take very long to compile.
> I guess what I'm trying to say here is, it's moving the problem from
> being a postgres specific issue (not compiled in -- having to recompile
> and install and not knowing if it's (dis)enabled) to a general body of
> knowledge (does my system support such-n-such capabilities).
The problem is not just a system-level one, but a filesystem-level
one. Enabling 64 bits by default might be dangerous, because a DBA
might think "oh, it supports largefiles by default" and therefore not
notice that the filesystem itself is not mounted with largefile
support. But I suspect that the developers would welcome autoconfig
patches if someone offered them.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M6K 3E3
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-08-12 15:40:10 | Re: Max user connections from Postgres Linux 7.2.1 |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-08-12 15:23:45 | Re: oid's and primary keys on insert |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2002-08-12 15:39:42 | Re: OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-08-12 15:18:17 | psql arguments |