Re: to_char and '=' weirdness

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Ludwig Lim <lud_nowhere_man(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Frank Joerdens <frank(at)joerdens(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Mailing List <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: to_char and '=' weirdness
Date: 2002-08-08 12:11:55
Message-ID: 20020808141154.C14021@zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 04:48:24AM -0700, Ludwig Lim wrote:
>
> > which would appear to indicate that to_char actually
> > yields the string
> > '04109'. Why doesn't the '=' operator work then?
>
> I tried running a test sql statement
> select(length(to_char(99,'00000')))
> It return six.
>
> I think that postgreSQL put a leading blank to
> indicate that it is a positive number (not sure, just
> my opinion)

Right.

> try using :
>
> select to_char(plz,'00000')
> from andresses
> where trim(to_char(plz,'00000'))='04109'

use FM instead trim(): to_char(plz,'FM00000')

...and please, better read docs :-)

Karel

--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/

C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Frank Joerdens 2002-08-08 12:46:47 Re: to_char and '=' weirdness
Previous Message Ludwig Lim 2002-08-08 11:48:24 Re: to_char and '=' weirdness