From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Ludwig Lim <lud_nowhere_man(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Frank Joerdens <frank(at)joerdens(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Mailing List <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: to_char and '=' weirdness |
Date: | 2002-08-08 12:11:55 |
Message-ID: | 20020808141154.C14021@zf.jcu.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 04:48:24AM -0700, Ludwig Lim wrote:
>
> > which would appear to indicate that to_char actually
> > yields the string
> > '04109'. Why doesn't the '=' operator work then?
>
> I tried running a test sql statement
> select(length(to_char(99,'00000')))
> It return six.
>
> I think that postgreSQL put a leading blank to
> indicate that it is a positive number (not sure, just
> my opinion)
Right.
> try using :
>
> select to_char(plz,'00000')
> from andresses
> where trim(to_char(plz,'00000'))='04109'
use FM instead trim(): to_char(plz,'FM00000')
...and please, better read docs :-)
Karel
--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Frank Joerdens | 2002-08-08 12:46:47 | Re: to_char and '=' weirdness |
Previous Message | Ludwig Lim | 2002-08-08 11:48:24 | Re: to_char and '=' weirdness |