Re: O'Reilly Open Source Convention Report

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-general(at)empires(dot)org>
Cc: Rob Brown-Bayliss <rob(at)zoism(dot)org>, PostgreSQL General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: O'Reilly Open Source Convention Report
Date: 2002-08-05 16:33:59
Message-ID: 200208051633.g75GXx302547@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Sunday 04 August 2002 10:13 pm, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 14:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > We did well I thought, though it still seemed that MySQL had a larger
> > > presence at the conference than PG. Maybe next year ;-)
> >
> > Without flames whats the story there? For example I read an interviwew
> > this week (on the web, cant recall where) where an guy from SUN briefly
> > mentioned putting MySQL up Oracle, in the context of providing a
> > complete package...
> >
> > Wouldn't PostgreSQL be a better contender due to the more advanced
> > features (assuming Mysql has not caught up)
> >
> > My basic understanding was MySQL was being pushed for speed rather than
> > features, whilst PostgreSQL was more feature rich and robust...
> >
> > Any calm and reasond answeres?
>
> If you happen to have the article handy, I would be interested to read it.

Here is the article and interview:

http://news.com.com/2008-1082-947510.html

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nigel J. Andrews 2002-08-05 17:04:28 Re: Memory usage / concept
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2002-08-05 16:20:31 Re: Puzzling planner choice (non-urgent)