| From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ralph Graulich <maillist(at)shauny(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reviewed: max. no of relations in a database |
| Date: | 2002-08-05 09:22:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200208051022.59067.dev@archonet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Saturday 03 Aug 2002 12:52 am, Ralph Graulich wrote:
> The problem only occures with loads of data (just inserting dummy data to
> the tables didn't show the problem!). Second, the problem only occures if
> there are lots of long relation names. As I changed all the relation names
> to shorter and less descriptive ones, the problem magically disappeared.
Missed the discussion a couple of days ago, but you weren't exceeding the
31-char length for table-names etc?
Might be worth a quick check. If you need to change this there's a constant in
a header file that needs to be changed and a recompile - see archive for
details.
- Richard Huxton
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-Christian Imbeault | 2002-08-05 09:48:16 | multi-column primary key insert error ('duplicate' complaint) |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2002-08-05 09:20:50 | Re: O'Reilly Open Source Convention Report |