| From: | Vikram Kulkarni <vkulkarn(at)brownforces(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: inconsistant regression test results... |
| Date: | 2002-08-03 18:09:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20020803180929.GC8705@padu.brownforces.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 01:57:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > The fork-failed messages suggest very strongly that you are running
> > out of kernel resources when you get more than a dozen or so server
> > processes going. Perhaps you are too low on swap space, or need to
> > enlarge the kernel's file table size.
>
> It's also possible that you are hitting a kernel limit on number of
> processes for a single user ID. See the TIP near the bottom of
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.2/postgres/regress-run.html
Doh. That was it. I copied serial_schedule over parallel_schedule then
all of the test passed. Now I feel silly for not noticing that note...
Thanks alot.
-Vik
--
Vikram Vinayak Kulkarni you can take the poster out of .test
vkulkarn(at)uiuc(dot)edu but you can't take .test out of the
vkulkarn(at)brownforces(dot)org poster.
-Jason Zych
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2002-08-03 18:27:33 | Re: O'Reilly Interview on PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-03 17:57:05 | Re: inconsistant regression test results... |