Re: getpid() function

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: getpid() function
Date: 2002-07-31 02:43:07
Message-ID: 200207310243.g6V2h7U17959@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:48:42PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > OK, renamed to backend_pid() to match the libpq name.
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> > Where does the mention belong in the docs? I have it in the monitoring
> > section in the stats section right now.
>
> I'd vote for User's Guide -> Functions & Operators -> Misc. Functions. I
> don't think it belongs in the monitoring section, since it isn't part of
> the stats collector and isn't really used for monitoring.

OK, docs moved to new section. I kept the function in pgstatfuncs.c.
Not sure where else to put it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-07-31 03:29:12 Re: getpid() function
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-07-31 02:32:31 Re: [GENERAL] Stats Collector

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-07-31 02:43:30 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-07-31 02:34:20 Rules and Views