From: | David Walker <pgsql(at)grax(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Virus Emails |
Date: | 2002-07-28 18:57:30 |
Message-ID: | 200207281357.30863.pgsql@grax.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
That may be true with some variants.
However my mail server has rejected the relay of several mails sent pretending
to be from me (envelope sender) to other parties and I think these could be
klez variants or another such virus. Since my server rejected them I cannot
be sure of the contents.
On Sunday 28 July 2002 04:06 am, Curt Sampson wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> > One of the nastier aspects of the Klez virus....
> >
> > However, even a trivial look at the detail mail headers (Received: etc)
> > will convince you that the spam did not originate from the claimed
> > "From:" address. If you care to post a few sets of complete headers,
> > we can probably triangulate pretty quickly on the virus-infected loser
> > who's originating these messages.
>
> It appears to me that the envelope sender is not forged by Klez.H,
> assuming that that's the virus I'm getting all the time. So you
> could check for the "Return-Path:" header, or maybe "From " (note:
> no colon) if you're using a Berkeley-mailbox style system, and find
> out the e-mail address of the real sender.
>
> cjs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthew Tedder | 2002-07-28 23:08:53 | Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-28 16:58:09 | Re: Question about LWLockAcquire's use of semaphores instead of spinlocks |