Re: Multi-Versions and Vacuum -- cf Oracle & Vacuum alt

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Anthony Berglas <anthony(dot)berglas(at)lucida(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multi-Versions and Vacuum -- cf Oracle & Vacuum alt
Date: 2002-07-23 21:57:22
Message-ID: 200207232157.g6NLvMF06515@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Anthony Berglas wrote:
> Thanks for doing the test in Oracle. What I did not see is you setting the
> Isolation Level. Or maybe that is what I forgot to do when I did similar
> tests some time ago! (I don't have Oracle handy or I'd try again.)
>
> However, the point remains, that there is no reason why PostgreSQL could not
> provide more serialized transactions in Read Committed mode without taking
> the hits with rollback that Serializable mode gives.

Yes, we could probably do it, but it doesn't make sense for SELECT to
use SERIALIZABLE while in the same transaction UPDATE/DELETE is using
READ COMMITTED. Seems that would cause all sorts of confusion.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2002-07-23 22:10:02 Re: column limit?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-23 21:55:41 Re: Error abort transaction behaviour