Re: pg_views.definition

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_views.definition
Date: 2002-07-16 17:07:43
Message-ID: 200207161707.g6GH7hj07733@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Auto reconstruction of a view based on its original textual definition
> > is still potentially interesting, but I submit that it won't necessarily
> > always give the right answer.
>
> Sure, it's another bullet to shoot yourself into someone elses foot.

Do we want this on TODO?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-07-16 17:33:43 Spec on pg_cast table/CREATE CAST command
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2002-07-16 17:05:00 Re: pg_views.definition