Re: DROP COLUMN

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DROP COLUMN
Date: 2002-07-16 16:30:31
Message-ID: 200207161630.g6GGUVu01940@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Makes sense. Of course, we could make a syscache that didn't return
> > system columns either.
> >
> > Actually, the original argument for negative attno's for dropped columns
> > was exactly for this case, that the system column check would catch
> > dropped columns too,
>
> > but it causes other problems that are harder to fix
> > so we _dropped_ the idea.
>
> What does this mean ?

Client programmers prefered the dropped flag rather than negative
attno's so we went with that.

> BTW would we do nothing for clients after all ?

Clients will now need to check that dropped flag.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-16 16:31:49 Re: [SQL] line datatype
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-07-16 16:30:27 Re: [SQL] line datatype