Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes
Date: 2002-07-16 15:59:07
Message-ID: 200207161559.g6GFx7128098@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> (In related news, how about filling up the oid/relfilenode numbers with
> >> zeros on the left, so a directory listing would reflect the numerical
> >> order?)
>
> > Yes, hex may be interesting as a more compact, consistent format. We
> > need to change the docs so oid2name and queries convert to hex on
> > output.
>
> I don't really see the value-added here. If we had made this decision
> before releasing 7.1, I'd not have objected; but at this point we're
> talking about breaking oid2name and any similar scripts that people
> may have developed, for what's really a *very* marginal gain. Who cares
> whether a directory listing reflects numerical order?

I don't see the big value either, just brainstorming.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Hart 2002-07-16 16:00:34 Re: [SQL] line datatype
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-07-16 15:57:00 Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-07-16 16:20:20 Re: Bug #712: Documentation Section 3.4 Binary Strings
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-07-16 15:57:00 Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes