From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL in mission-critical system |
Date: | 2002-07-16 12:42:03 |
Message-ID: | 20020716084203.A22445@mail.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 11:15:02AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> I'd be careful about recommending this. Debian is notoriously behind in
> versions in their stable tree.
While it's true that Debian doesn't tend to have the latest and
greatest in stable (even right at the time stable comes out), the
PostgreSQL maintainer (Oliver Elphick) for Debian is very quick to
release .debs for stable for the most recent PostgreSQL release. So
the notoriety is not justified in this case. And one might argue
that the strong stability of Debian's stable release is a _reason_
to prefer it for servers.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M6K 3E3
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-07-16 12:54:43 | Re: memory |
Previous Message | mixo | 2002-07-16 12:41:07 | Re: age |