Re: Performance impact of record sizes

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Moore <postgres(at)tinyvital(dot)com>, Postgresql Admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance impact of record sizes
Date: 2002-07-16 04:49:00
Message-ID: 200207160449.g6G4n0l06741@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I see in the data types section for character types this text:
>
> There are no performance differences between these three types,
> apart from the increased storage size when using the blank-padded
> type.
>
> I can't improve on that.

I added a mention of TOAST in the character data type docs:

Long values are also stored in background tables so they don't
interfere with rapid access to the shorter column values.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-07-16 06:08:01 Re: initdb failing - core dump
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-16 02:33:35 Re: Performance impact of record sizes