| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Future of src/utils |
| Date: | 2002-07-15 23:27:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200207152327.g6FNRs320480@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > However, over time, this distinction has broken down and we have a
> > number of backend/port stuff used in other binaries. I propose moving
> > the src/utils remaining items into src/backend/port, and removing the
> > src/utils directory.
>
> I propose the reverse operation.
Yea, I thought of that. Means all the subdirectores have to move too.
It is more extreme than moving stuff from /src/utils, but it is more
logical.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-15 23:32:27 | Re: utils C files |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-15 23:26:36 | Re: getopt_long search in configure |