Re: Pushing PostgreSQL to the Limit (urgent!)

From: Chris Albertson <chrisalbertson90278(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira <baptista(at)linuxsolutions(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pushing PostgreSQL to the Limit (urgent!)
Date: 2002-07-15 19:28:13
Message-ID: 20020715192813.26561.qmail@web14701.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


--- Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
<baptista(at)linuxsolutions(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:

> I will put it to insert 30 M (millions) registers by month (or 1
> Million by day) in a year is about 400 Millions registers.
> Can pgsql support this? In What Machine?

I have a similar application. I am storing astronomical data
from a set of automated cameras. The data just floods in
forever. I can see a billion rows in the future.
I find that I _can_ keep up using only modest hardware IF I use
"COPY" and not "INSERT" to input the data. "COPY" is much, much
faster. Also indexes help with SELECT speed not really hurt
COPY/INSERT speed so you need to ballance. 1 Million per
24 hour period is not to much for a "standard" PC BUT if you
also want to do many SELECTS or JOINS at the same time then
you will need more so the hardware depends on what _else_ you
are doing.

=====
Chris Albertson
Home: 310-376-1029 chrisalbertson90278(at)yahoo(dot)com
Cell: 310-990-7550
Office: 310-336-5189 Christopher(dot)J(dot)Albertson(at)aero(dot)org

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2002-07-15 19:30:12 Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
Previous Message David Blood 2002-07-15 19:09:59 memory