From: | <George(dot)T(dot)Essig(at)stls(dot)frb(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2002-07-15 13:47:37 |
Message-ID: | 200207151349.JAA29886@p1fed1.frb.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Two years ago on phpbuilder.com, there was a performance comparison between
MySQL and PostgreSQL. Tim Perdue simulated load on various
sourceforge.net pages. See:
http://phpbuilder.com/columns/tim20001112.php3?print_mode=1
George Essig
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 20:54:51 -0500
> From: Steve Lane <slane(at)fmpro(dot)com>
> To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
> Message-ID: <B957959B(dot)10424%slane(at)fmpro(dot)com>
>
> Are there any current benchmarks showing postgres' performance against
other
> major dbs? I've only seen one, and I think it's a couple of years old.
Eweek
> profiled major commercial dbs and had mySQL as the open source
> representative. Not even a whisper about PgSQL. I'd love to see some
current
> numbers, just to fend off with a stick the people who keep asking me why
I
> don't use mySQL.
>
> -- sgl
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-07-15 13:53:11 | Re: recursing down a tree |
Previous Message | Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder | 2002-07-15 13:47:28 | Re: SERIAL behaviour |