Re: Indexing UNIONs

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Indexing UNIONs
Date: 2002-07-15 20:12:52
Message-ID: 20020715130911.V41271-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I have two tables which are often browsed together through a UNION view, like:
>
> CREATE VIEW two_tables AS
> SELECT t1.id, t1.name, t1.abbreviation, t1.juris_id
> FROM t1
> UNION ALL
> SELECT t2.id, t2.name, NULL, t2.juris_id
> FROM t2;
>
> This works fine as a view, since I have made the id's unique between the two
> tables (using a sequence). However, as t1 has 100,000 records, it is
> vitally important that queries against this view use an index.

We had a discussion recently on -general about this. Right now the
planner won't push the conditions down into the arms of the union because
noone's been sure under what conditions the optimization is safe.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-07-15 21:01:38 Re: Sorry..
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2002-07-15 19:00:07 Indexing UNIONs