Re: memory strangeness (fwd)

From: Tim Ellis <Tim(dot)Ellis(at)gamet(dot)com>
To: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
Cc: stigmata(at)blackangel(dot)net, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: memory strangeness (fwd)
Date: 2002-07-08 18:23:04
Message-ID: 20020708112304.733fbe30.Tim.Ellis@gamet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:06:00 +0900 (JST)
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> wrote:

> > On this particular system, though, it's doing
> > nothing except PG. 384 MB of RAM, I can give PG 160 of it, which
> > leaves me with some 170 MB of idle RAM.
>
> No, that's not idle RAM; that's buffer cache. (FreeBSD, like most
> modern Unix operating systems, will use any spare physical memory
> to cache blocks read from the disk.) If you allocate 160/170, you
> now have pretty much maximized your chances that postgres and the
> operating system will be buffering the same data, and made your
> memory as minimally effective as possible.

Is there not a method of reading a disk block and instructing the OS not
to buffer it, or am I hallucinating? (My main RDBMS experience experience
is on Solaris, and I could swear that major RDBMSs on that OS will ask the
OS not to buffer disk I/O on behalf of the database)

--
Tim Ellis
DBA, Gamet

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message becks 2002-07-08 18:39:07 disk space
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-08 18:13:06 Re: PostgreSQL data -> Oracle