Re: Authentication in batch processing

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alfred Anzlovar <fredi(at)biff(dot)logon(dot)si>
Cc: Alfred Anzlovar <fuzzy(at)logon(dot)si>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Authentication in batch processing
Date: 2002-07-04 16:16:13
Message-ID: 200207041616.g64GGD800114@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Alfred Anzlovar wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > How about PGUSER/PGPASSWORD? That will work. This is assuming you
> > don't have an OS (BSD?) that displays environment variables for a
> > process.
>
> No BSD, Linux. And it works. Thanks.
>
> Well, I must admit we had some rain today, but after your answer sun came
> from behind the clouds :)
>
> More thanks and greetings from the Sunny side of the Alps.
> Alfred Anzlovar

7.3 may remove PGPASSWORD, I think, and instead allow you to specify a
file that contains the password.

> PS
> Is it ok to send e-mail to pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org AND TO you?

Yes, of course.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Moore 2002-07-04 18:24:33 Performance impact of record sizes
Previous Message Alfred Anzlovar 2002-07-04 15:49:16 Re: Authentication in batch processing