Re: listen/notify argument (old topic revisited)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers(at)empires(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: listen/notify argument (old topic revisited)
Date: 2002-07-03 17:49:28
Message-ID: 200207031749.g63HnSf01762@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> themselves. (I'd also be inclined to include the hash code in the
> transmitted message, so that readers could more quickly ignore
> uninteresting messages.)

Doesn't seem worth it, and how would the user know their hash; they
already have a C string for comparison. Do we have to handle possible
hash collisions?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-07-03 17:54:51 Re: listen/notify argument (old topic revisited)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-03 17:45:56 Re: libpq++ build problems