Re: Wierd Explain

From: Thomas Beutin <tyrone(at)laokoon(dot)IN-Berlin(dot)DE>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wierd Explain
Date: 2002-06-18 15:43:58
Message-ID: 20020618174358.F24882@laokoon.bug.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 09:03:50AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Thomas Beutin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 12:33:26PM +0530, Varun Kacholia wrote:
> > > Many ppl have suggested me vaccum analyze .
> > > But the manuals say me that it is reqd after "major update/deletion".
> > > I have just 'created' the tables and done fresh insertions.
> > > is it still required?
>
> > AFAIK is not.
>
> Actually, you do have to run it then. Analyze is never done automatically
> by Postgresql, so the postmaster has no idea how your data are organized
> yet. (Varun's data, not Thomas's :-)

Sorry, i forgot the postings bevor. But correct me if i'm wrong:
Creating a fresh table an inserting data. For the data retreiving
the vacuum analyze is not neccessary, but to get correct values
by explain it is required. Right?

Greetings.
-tb
--
Thomas Beutin tb(at)laokoon(dot)IN-Berlin(dot)DE
Beam me up, Scotty. There is no intelligent live down in Redmond.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2002-06-18 16:14:58 Re: Wierd Explain
Previous Message philip johnson 2002-06-18 15:38:39 Re: Help automate pg_dump