From: | Thomas Beutin <tyrone(at)laokoon(dot)IN-Berlin(dot)DE> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Wierd Explain |
Date: | 2002-06-18 15:43:58 |
Message-ID: | 20020618174358.F24882@laokoon.bug.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 09:03:50AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Thomas Beutin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 12:33:26PM +0530, Varun Kacholia wrote:
> > > Many ppl have suggested me vaccum analyze .
> > > But the manuals say me that it is reqd after "major update/deletion".
> > > I have just 'created' the tables and done fresh insertions.
> > > is it still required?
>
> > AFAIK is not.
>
> Actually, you do have to run it then. Analyze is never done automatically
> by Postgresql, so the postmaster has no idea how your data are organized
> yet. (Varun's data, not Thomas's :-)
Sorry, i forgot the postings bevor. But correct me if i'm wrong:
Creating a fresh table an inserting data. For the data retreiving
the vacuum analyze is not neccessary, but to get correct values
by explain it is required. Right?
Greetings.
-tb
--
Thomas Beutin tb(at)laokoon(dot)IN-Berlin(dot)DE
Beam me up, Scotty. There is no intelligent live down in Redmond.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2002-06-18 16:14:58 | Re: Wierd Explain |
Previous Message | philip johnson | 2002-06-18 15:38:39 | Re: Help automate pg_dump |