Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter
Date: 2002-06-17 02:36:20
Message-ID: 200206170236.g5H2aKp18804@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > - there is certainly a patch outstanding that redesigns the
> > setup dialogues that I posted that would be affected by this...
>
> I don't object to remove the KSQO option at server side.
> But why must the option be removed from the odbc driver
> together ? As I mentioned many many times, the driver
> isn't only for the recent (especially not yet released)
> version of servers. I think we had better have a separate
> dialog for obsolete options.

Yes, this is why I am asking. If you want to keep it for <7.1 releases,
that is fine.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-17 05:41:34 WITH handling in CREATE USER, etc
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-06-17 01:57:56 Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marek Mosiewicz 2002-06-17 08:33:51 Native OLE DB. What do you think about it
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-06-17 01:57:56 Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter