From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ksqo? |
Date: | 2002-06-16 00:09:56 |
Message-ID: | 200206160009.g5G09ub25560@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> > > Hmmm... Well, I'll take a look at it, but I'll probably just leave it
> > > be -- since the optimization might actually return invalid results, it
> > > doesn't seem like a very valuable thing to have, IMHO.
> >
> > Yeah, I never cared for the fact that it altered the semantics of the
> > query, even if only subtly. But I'm hesitant to rip out something that
> > someone went to the trouble of writing and contributing ...
>
> If it does nothing, we certainly should remove it from GUC so people
> don't see a meaningless option. We can then keep it in CVS to see if we
> want it later.
Here is the email from May 28 discussing the removal of GUC.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-06-16 00:15:40 | Caught up on email |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-06-16 00:08:35 | Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter |