Re: Would a PostgreSQL only hosting environment be of

From: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Would a PostgreSQL only hosting environment be of
Date: 2002-06-15 13:57:07
Message-ID: 20020615094825.J12834-100000@zoraida.natserv.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>Over here at Command Prompt we are considering starting a small
> dedicated hosting division for PostgreSQL users. This would be a
> business class service and would run on our redundant 6Mb connection.

Not that I mind that much, but I think that commercial postings are
supposed to go to the announce list.

> Would this interest any PostgreSQL users? We are not really looking to
> be a rackspace as much as a specialized business database hosting
> provider to accent our current product line.

I certainly would, although at the moment I am trying a company.
I left my previous provider of 5+ years because they didn't have
postgresql support. I was extremely happy with my previous ISP, but I
needed postgresql.

I must admit that I am been much more patient with this new
provider I am trying due to the lack of alternatives. If there were other
alternatives I may not be so patient.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Reyes 2002-06-15 14:02:53 Re: large database on postgres
Previous Message tony 2002-06-15 13:43:52 Re: advocacy