| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Schemas and template1 |
| Date: | 2002-06-12 03:13:58 |
| Message-ID: | 200206120313.g5C3Dwx22438@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > As part of createdb, the new database will have to have it's public
> > schema changed to world-writable.
>
> That ain't gonna happen, unfortunately. CREATE DATABASE runs in some
> database other than the target one, so it's essentially impossible for
> the newly-created DB to contain any internal state that's different
> from the template DB. Next idea please?
Yes, there was an even bigger problem with my argument. If someone
wanted to make public no-write, and have all created databases inherit
from that, it wouldn't work because it would clear that on creation.
How about if we hard-wire template1 as being no-write to public
somewhere in the code, rather than in the db tables?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-12 03:22:32 | Re: Analyze on large changes... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-06-12 03:11:50 | Re: Analyze on large changes... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-12 03:42:28 | Re: Schemas and template1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-12 02:57:57 | Re: Schemas and template1 |