Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead,

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > 2. Once Branch created, any *partially implemented* features will get
> > > rip'd out of the -STABLE branch and only fixes to the existing, fully
> > > implement features will go in
> >
> > Now, that is an interesting idea.
>
> Ya, I thought it was when you -and- Tom proposed it :)
>
> I quote from a message on June 8th:
>
> =======================
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > So, I we should:
> > > Warn people in July that beta is September 1 and all features
> > > have to be complete by then, or they get ripped out.
> >
> > I thought that was more or less the same thing I was proposing...
> ========================

What I thought was interesting was having the CURRENT branch keep the
feature so the guy could continue development, even if we disable in
STABLE.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026