Re: PL/pgSQL TODO

Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > I was just checking the TODO list and noticed that none of my suggestions or
> > John Proctors suggestions regarding PL/pgSQL improvements had made it on to
> > the list. Is this because our ideas have been rejected, or because nobody
> > has time to deal with the TODO list?
>
> Bruce normally maintains the TODO list, and he's been on vacation all
> this month (won't be back till June 1, I believe). It's just lagging
> a bit ...

I have reached this message and I your TODO item discussion was:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=20020517114156.Q20428-100000%40megazone23.bigpanda.com&rnum=18&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DJosh%2BBerkus%2Bgroup:comp.databases.postgresql.*%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26scoring%3Dd%26selm%3D20020517114156.Q20428-100000%2540megazone23.bigpanda.com%26rnum%3D18

And I assume the TODO item is:

* Allow DEFERRABLE UNIQUE constraints

Added to TODO under Referential Integrity.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026