Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Rajesh Kumar Mallah(dot)" <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization
Date: 2002-06-05 16:33:48
Message-ID: 200206051633.g55GXm718101@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On May 13, 2002 12:50 am, Rajesh Kumar Mallah. wrote:
> > Its advocated "dont kill -9 the postmaster" and i rarely do that.
>
> Advocated or not, kill -9 is supposed to be the last resort. If nothing else
> works then kill -9 should kill any Unix process. As Tom says, if it doesn't
> then it suggests an OS (probably driver) problem.
>
> Now if only I could get IBM to understand that. They still claim that my
> problem is that PostgreSQL (an "unsupported" application) is doing something
> to catch SIGKILL.

First, an application can't catch SIGKILL. It never arrives to
applications. It is supposed to pull the process with no warning.

However, there are things processes can do to wedge themselves in a
system call so they don't see the SIGKILL. Of course, as soon as they
return from the system call, they die.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jon Franz 2002-06-05 16:45:24 Re: clustering
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2002-06-05 15:34:37 Re: pgaccess.org - invitation for a working meeting

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-06-05 18:12:02 Indexing Metaphone?
Previous Message Sandeep Chibber 2002-06-05 04:13:53 Postgres Function Proble