| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle |
| Date: | 2002-05-28 14:53:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20020528105346.E4231@mail.libertyrms.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 09:00:43PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> TODO updated:
>
> Add BSD-licensed qsort() for 32-bit Solaris
I've received an email noting that someone else ran a test program
with the 64 bit library, and had just as bad performance as the 32
bit one. I haven't had a chance to look at it yet, but it suggests
that the result is still inconclusive. Maybe, if just one more fire
goes out here, I can look at it this week.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M6K 3E3
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-28 14:58:58 | Re: Invalid length of startup packet |
| Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2002-05-28 14:29:30 | Re: Invalid length of startup packet |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-28 15:01:22 | Re: cache lookup failed: hack pg_* tables? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-28 14:50:48 | Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API |