| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication status |
| Date: | 2002-05-28 07:40:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20020528074003.GC1706@feivel.credativ.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 05:12:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Last I talked to Darren, the replication code was modified to merge into
> our 7.2 tree. There are still pieces missing so it will not be
> functional when applied. It is remotely possible there could be
> master-slave in 7.3, but I doubt it.
This is about pgreplication I think. Is the the replication project of
choice for pgsql? IIRC there quite some projects for this topic:
PostgreSQL replicator
Rserver
Usogres
dbbalancer
What about these? We seem to have some proof-of-concept code of rserver
in contrib. Dbbalancer seems to be more focussed on balancing access and
not replication, but can do this too.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karel Zak | 2002-05-28 07:53:53 | Re: Replication status |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2002-05-28 07:37:29 | Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 |