From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WAL FILES |
Date: | 2002-05-27 21:17:58 |
Message-ID: | 200205272117.g4RLHw419198@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Olivier PRENANT wrote:
> Hi every one.
>
> I just moved (at last!) to 7.2.1. Works like a charm...
> I'm suprised though by the number of WAL files.
>
> I have 8 files where postgresql.conf says WAL_FILES=4.
>
> What did I miss ? (I have no outstanding transaction)
>
> FWIW, t's on UW711.
No, you are fine. The current GUC params are confusing. I did update
the documentation for 7.3, but I plan to reorganize those params to be
more meaningful.
Actually, I have in TODO:
Remove wal_files postgresql.conf option because WAL files are now
recycled
because the param no longer controls what you think it controls. In 7.1
WAL files where not recycled, so WAL_FILES was used to pre-allocate
files so there wasn't as much happening during checkpoint. Now, with
recycling, there is no need.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-27 21:18:42 | Re: is there any backend timeout undocumented? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-05-27 21:12:33 | Re: Replication status |