| From: | Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Q: unexpected result from SRF in SQL |
| Date: | 2002-05-26 17:04:04 |
| Message-ID: | 200205261904.04964.barwick@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sunday 26 May 2002 17:58, Tom Lane wrote:
(...)
> If anyone does someday resurrect fjoin-like functionality, a reasonable
> SQL-style syntax for invoking it would be
>
> SELECT (bar(1)).*;
>
> which would still leave us wanting to raise an error if you just write
> "SELECT bar(1)".
The reason why I posted the question is that I had defined a function
that should have worked, but kept giving me back strange numbers,
so I spent a whole five minutes trying to debug the function before
I realised I was calling it in the wrong way (doh). An error here would
be a Good Idea, IMHO.
Ian Barwick
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Barwick | 2002-05-26 17:58:19 | Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers |
| Previous Message | Olivier PRENANT | 2002-05-26 16:55:21 | WAL FILES |