From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: libpq++ fixes |
Date: | 2002-05-19 15:21:18 |
Message-ID: | 20020519112118.368628b1.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Sun, 19 May 2002 17:14:23 +0200 (CEST)
"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Neil Conway writes:
>
> > This patch fixes a few minor problems with libpq++: remove the deprecated
> > PQExec(" ") in the wrapper around PQnotifies(), fix the Makefile for
> > the examples so that they will actually compile properly (with the
> > exception of #5, which depends on internal headers), make a minor change
> > to libpq++.h so that "make examples" now works on my machine, update
> > some documentation, fix some grammatical problems, and remove some of
> > the more hideous comments.
>
> Unfortunately, replacing #include <header.h> with #include <header> is
> going to break a bunch of other platforms.
Really? Which ones?
> As for the formatting changes, maybe we should run pgindent over those
> files. It seems it has never been done.
Yeah -- I was going to suggest that. But given how hideous most of
the libpq++ code is, and the availibility of a replacement for it
(see libpqxx), I'm not sure if it's worth the bother...
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-19 16:58:48 | Re: libpq++ fixes |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-05-19 15:14:23 | Re: libpq++ fixes |