Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ?

From: "Rajesh Kumar Mallah(dot)" <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ?
Date: 2002-05-13 12:04:12
Message-ID: 200205131734.12619.mallah@trade-india.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql


Hi,

I vaguely remember postmaster not responding to
kill -9 even on Linux,

i can confirm next time when (god forbids) my postmaster
goes crazy. ;-)

i feel lucky now that my postmaster is up for more that
(24 hrs)

(no offence intended , there have been instances of my postmaster
running for as long as 3 months)

regds
mallah.

On Monday 13 May 2002 03:51 pm, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On May 13, 2002 12:50 am, Rajesh Kumar Mallah. wrote:
> > Its advocated "dont kill -9 the postmaster" and i rarely do that.
>
> Advocated or not, kill -9 is supposed to be the last resort. If nothing
> else works then kill -9 should kill any Unix process. As Tom says, if it
> doesn't then it suggests an OS (probably driver) problem.
>
> Now if only I could get IBM to understand that. They still claim that my
> problem is that PostgreSQL (an "unsupported" application) is doing
> something to catch SIGKILL.

--
Rajesh Kumar Mallah,
Project Manager (Development)
Infocom Network Limited, New Delhi
phone: +91(11)6152172 (221) (L) ,9811255597 (M)

Visit http://www.trade-india.com ,
India's Leading B2B eMarketplace.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-05-13 12:18:58 Re: TRUNCATE
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2002-05-13 11:42:43 Re: Operator Comments

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Edipo Elder Fernandes de Melo 2002-05-13 13:27:44 timestamp and datestyles
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 2002-05-13 10:21:19 Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ?