From: | cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? |
Date: | 2002-05-09 17:02:33 |
Message-ID: | 20020509170233.2DC5A38CB3@cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I think, and I know people are probably sick of me spouting opinions,
> that if you want a Windows presence for PostgreSQL, then we should
> write a real Win32 version.
The crucial wrong word is the word "we."
If _you_ want a Windows presence, then _you_ should write a real Win32
version. That clearly attaches responsibility to someone who is interested.
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "gro.mca@" "enworbbc"))
http://www.cbbrowne.com/info/unix.html
"I'm not switching from slrn. I'm quite confident that anything that
*needs* to be posted in HTML is fatuous garbage not worth my time."
-- David M. Cook <davecook(at)home(dot)com>
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc@" "enworbbc"))
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/spreadsheets.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #166. "If the rebels manage to trick me, I
will make a note of what they did so that I do not keep falling for
the same trick over and over again." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2002-05-09 17:05:58 | Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2002-05-09 17:00:31 | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? |