Re: How much work is a native Windows application?

From: cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How much work is a native Windows application?
Date: 2002-05-09 17:02:33
Message-ID: 20020509170233.2DC5A38CB3@cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I think, and I know people are probably sick of me spouting opinions,
> that if you want a Windows presence for PostgreSQL, then we should
> write a real Win32 version.

The crucial wrong word is the word "we."

If _you_ want a Windows presence, then _you_ should write a real Win32
version. That clearly attaches responsibility to someone who is interested.
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "gro.mca@" "enworbbc"))
http://www.cbbrowne.com/info/unix.html
"I'm not switching from slrn. I'm quite confident that anything that
*needs* to be posted in HTML is fatuous garbage not worth my time."
-- David M. Cook <davecook(at)home(dot)com>

--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc@" "enworbbc"))
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/spreadsheets.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #166. "If the rebels manage to trick me, I
will make a note of what they did so that I do not keep falling for
the same trick over and over again." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2002-05-09 17:05:58 Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2002-05-09 17:00:31 Re: How much work is a native Windows application?