| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy |
| Date: | 2002-05-09 18:12:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200205091412.16152.lamar.owen@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 09 May 2002 07:51 am, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > 3) If (2) is the case, then development could continue under the BSD
> > > license, since developers could use the BSD-original code for their
> > > development work. So there is no risk of "backflow polution".
> > Can PostgreSQL, Inc be the GPL distributor for these purposes, being a
> > separate entity from the PostgreSQL Global Development Group?
> Ummmm ... no? We tend to be anti-GPL over here, since its anti-business
> ... gborg would be a good place for any of this ...
I can see my feeble attempt at humor fell flat. Sorry.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2002-05-09 18:13:59 | Re: Issues tangential to win32 support |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2002-05-09 18:02:02 | Re: pgaccess |