Re: OK, lets talk portability.

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "mlw" <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OK, lets talk portability.
Date: 2002-05-09 08:16:15
Message-ID: 200205091016.15225.jm.poure@freesurf.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le Jeudi 9 Mai 2002 09:12, Dave Page a écrit :
> If we can get it to this stage then I'm sure Jean-Michel and I could
> come up with a nice installer that will allow us to keep the GPL & BSD
> code nicely separate on a swerver somewhere & still allow an automated
> download/install...

This would be quite easy. But the problem is that we might need to rename
Cygwin.dll in order to avoid conflicts. It may become a maintenance
nightmare. This will not stop Cygwin from provinding PostgreSQL neither.

To my mind, the solution is to deliver all software needed (native Apache,
native Python, Native OpenOffice, Cygwin layer, Dev-C++, pgAdmin2,
Cygwin-KDE) within a SINGLE installer. See my previous mails.

Work is time-consuming. If I have to spend time on a project, this will be for
getting rid of Microsoft hegemony, not the less.

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-05-09 08:53:33 Why you should Join W32/Debian to save the world from Microsoft
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-05-09 08:10:44 Re: How much work is a native Windows application?