Re: More harrowing tales of TOAST growth

From: Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org>
To: Sean Chittenden <chitt(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More harrowing tales of TOAST growth
Date: 2002-05-05 04:30:34
Message-ID: 20020505043034.GA19250@heat
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 06:50:17PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > I ran this experiment for 10 minutes. At time 0 the database size
> > was 2MB. At 60 seconds the size was 22MB. The size continued
> > upward:
> >
> > Time | Size
> > 0 2
> > 60 7
> > 120 60
> > 180 109
> > 240 181
> > 300 282
> > 360 284
> > 420 363
> > 480 442
> > 540 549
> > 600 557
>
> This may be outisde of the possibility of your environment, but have
> you tried a VACUUM FULL or VACUUM FREEZE ? -sc

As I've said before, dump and reload is MUCH faster than vacuum
full, and they both require the same exclusive access. Therefore
vacuum full isn't any better than my current situation.

-jwb

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hans Plum 2002-05-05 14:59:14 Listing of Rules within psql?
Previous Message Feng-Cheng Chang 2002-05-05 02:05:42 Fatal error after a system crash