Re: PostgreSQL mission statement?

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr, David Terrell <dbt(at)meat(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL mission statement?
Date: 2002-05-02 14:44:45
Message-ID: 200205021044.45825.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 02 May 2002 08:56 am, Jim Mercer wrote:
> i think a mission statement full of boastfulness is just a sound bite, and
> will be dismissed as such.

> if you want the mission statement to have an impact, then it needs to be
> acceptable not only to those who fully embrace it, but also acceptable to
> those who will respect the project from a distance.

> otherwise its not a mission statement, its akin to a corporate cheer.
> ( i'm picturing Steve Balmer's superlative exhaltations to the converted
> http://www.ntk.net/ballmer/mirrors.html )

In the corporate world a mission statement is often the 'sound bite' and a
'corporate cheer'.

I personally think
"To have fun making and improving the most extensible, robust, ACID-compliant
Free database system on the planet" wraps up at least why I think we're all
here. s/Free/Open Source/g if you'd rather not invoke a stallmanism. Or
even s/Free/BSD-licensed/g if you want to really state the obvious. :-)

If other projects' members are insulted by that, then they're just too
sensitive.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-05-02 14:52:44 Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-02 14:33:36 Re: DROP TABLE hangs because of same table foreign key