From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr, David Terrell <dbt(at)meat(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? |
Date: | 2002-05-02 14:44:45 |
Message-ID: | 200205021044.45825.lamar.owen@wgcr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 02 May 2002 08:56 am, Jim Mercer wrote:
> i think a mission statement full of boastfulness is just a sound bite, and
> will be dismissed as such.
> if you want the mission statement to have an impact, then it needs to be
> acceptable not only to those who fully embrace it, but also acceptable to
> those who will respect the project from a distance.
> otherwise its not a mission statement, its akin to a corporate cheer.
> ( i'm picturing Steve Balmer's superlative exhaltations to the converted
> http://www.ntk.net/ballmer/mirrors.html )
In the corporate world a mission statement is often the 'sound bite' and a
'corporate cheer'.
I personally think
"To have fun making and improving the most extensible, robust, ACID-compliant
Free database system on the planet" wraps up at least why I think we're all
here. s/Free/Open Source/g if you'd rather not invoke a stallmanism. Or
even s/Free/BSD-licensed/g if you want to really state the obvious. :-)
If other projects' members are insulted by that, then they're just too
sensitive.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-02 14:52:44 | Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-02 14:33:36 | Re: DROP TABLE hangs because of same table foreign key |