Re: md5 passwords and pg_shadow

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: md5 passwords and pg_shadow
Date: 2002-04-25 05:50:32
Message-ID: 200204250550.g3P5oWE27098@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Why does the password_encryption GUC variable default to false?
>
> AFAICT there shouldn't be any issues with client compatibility -- in
> fact, I'd be inclined to rip out all support for storing cleartext
> passwords...

It is false so passwords can be handled by pre-7.2 clients. Once you
encrypt them, you can't use passwords on pre-7.2 clients because they
don't understand the double-md5 hash required. We will set it to true,
but when are most pre-7.2 clients gone?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Loftis 2002-04-25 05:52:47 Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
Previous Message Michael Loftis 2002-04-25 05:43:11 Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead