| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: md5 passwords and pg_shadow |
| Date: | 2002-04-25 05:50:32 |
| Message-ID: | 200204250550.g3P5oWE27098@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Why does the password_encryption GUC variable default to false?
>
> AFAICT there shouldn't be any issues with client compatibility -- in
> fact, I'd be inclined to rip out all support for storing cleartext
> passwords...
It is false so passwords can be handled by pre-7.2 clients. Once you
encrypt them, you can't use passwords on pre-7.2 clients because they
don't understand the double-md5 hash required. We will set it to true,
but when are most pre-7.2 clients gone?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Loftis | 2002-04-25 05:52:47 | Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE |
| Previous Message | Michael Loftis | 2002-04-25 05:43:11 | Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead |