Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > OK, the votes are in:
> > > >
> > > > #1
> > > > Lamar Owen
> > > > Jan Wieck
> > > > Tom Lane
> > > > Bruce Momjian
> > > > Joe Conway
> > > > Curt Sampson
> > > > Michael Loftis
> > > > Vince Vielhaber
> > > > Sander Steffann
> > > >
> > > > #2
> > > > Bradley McLean
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #3
> > > >
> > > > #?
> > > > Thomas Lockhart
> > > > Hiroshi Inoue
> > > >
> > > > Looks like #1 is the clear winner.
> > >
> > > I voted not only ? but also 2 and 3.
> > > And haven't I asked twice or so if it's a vote ?
> >
> > Yes, it is a vote, and now that we see how everyone feels, we can
> > decide what to do.
> >
> > Hiroshi, you can't vote for 2, 3, and ?.
>
> Why ?
> I don't think the items are exclusive.

Well, 2 says roll back only after transaction aborts, 3 says honor all
SET's, and ? says choose the behavior depending on the variable. How
can you have 2, 3, and ?. Seems ? is the catch-all vote because it
doesn't predefine the same behavior for all variables.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026