Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mario Weilguni <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Date: 2002-04-24 02:21:11
Message-ID: 200204240221.g3O2LBg21416@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Patch applied. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mario Weilguni wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. April 2002 17:44 schrieb Tom Lane:
> > "Mario Weilguni" <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com> writes:
> > > And I did not find out how I can detect the large object
> > > chunksize, either from getting it from the headers (include
> > > "storage/large_object.h" did not work)
> >
>
> You did not answer if it's ok to post the patch, hope it's ok:

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-24 02:22:02 Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-24 02:13:06 Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is not