Re: One particular large database application

From: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com>
To: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
Cc: Nikolay Mihaylov <pg(at)nmmm(dot)nu>, pgsql General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: One particular large database application
Date: 2002-04-22 03:25:19
Message-ID: 20020421231953.C1450-100000@zoraida.natserv.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Curt Sampson wrote:

> One of the things they want me to try is partitioning the data
> across multiple machines, and submitting queries in parallel. So
> I'll be writing software that will take a query, figure out what
> tables it needs to apply that query to, apply that query to those
> tables (chosing the servers appropriately as well), and consolidate
> the results.

Interesting.

> For hardware, it seems that a bunch of cheap, basic PCs would do
> the trick. I'm thinking of a system with a 1-2 GHz CPU, 512 MB of
> memory, a 20-40 GB IDE disk for the system, log and temporary space,
> and an 80 GB or larger IDE disk for the data. If reliability is a
> real concern, probably mirroring the disks is the best option.

May I suggest a different approach?
>From what I understand this data may not change often.
How about instead of getting numerous cheap machines get only 2 or 3 good
machines with 2 15K RPM drives, 4GB of RAM and 1 IDE for the OS. Or if
you can get even more money... 4 15K rpm drives on Raid 0.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2002-04-22 03:41:57 Re: One particular large database application
Previous Message Paul M Foster 2002-04-22 02:58:10 Returns from ExecTuplesOk()