From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: updated qCache |
Date: | 2002-04-18 08:34:08 |
Message-ID: | 20020418103408.A13923@zf.jcu.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:17:51PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's an updated version of the experimental qCache patch I
> posted a couple days ago (which is a port of Karel Zak's 7.0
> work to CVS HEAD).
>
> Changes:
>
> - fix segfault in EXECUTE under some circumstances (reported
> by Barry Lind)
> - fix some memory leaks (thanks to Karel Zak)
> - write more regression tests (make check still won't pass)
> - re-diff against CVS HEAD
> - more code cleanup, minor tweaks
>
> However, I've tentatively decided that I think the best
> way to go forward is to rewrite this code. IMHO the utility of
> plans cached in shared memory is fairly limited, but the
> code that implements this adds a lot of complex to the patch.
> I'm planning to re-implement PREPARE/EXECUTE with support only
> for locally-prepared plans, using the existing patch as a
> guide. The result should be a simpler patch -- once it's
> in CVS we can worry about more advanced plan caching
> techiques. Any complaints/comments on this plan?
I agree too :-) I think remove the shared memory code from this patch
is easy and local memory storage is there already done.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tycho | 2002-04-18 08:41:15 | Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE |
Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2002-04-18 08:08:12 | Re: [SQL] A bug in gistPageAddItem()/gist_tuple_replacekey() ??? (fwd) |