Re: Java as PG Procedural Language

From:	Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To:	tom dyson <tom(at)torchbox(dot)com>
Cc:	pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: Java as PG Procedural Language
Date:	2002-04-17 07:42:53
Message-ID:	200204170942.53636.jm.poure@freesurf.fr
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2002-03-28 16:54:47 from Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org>  2002-03-28 17:19:41 from "Steve Wolfe" <steve(at)iboats(dot)com>   2002-03-28 17:37:43 from Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org>   2002-03-29 16:16:27 from "Marin Dimitrov" <marin(dot)dimitrov(at)sirma(dot)bg>    2002-03-29 16:35:25 from Oxeye <oxeye(at)optonline(dot)net>     2002-03-29 21:47:48 from "Arguile" <arguile(at)lucentstudios(dot)com>      2002-04-16 13:51:45 from tom dyson <tom(at)torchbox(dot)com>       2002-04-16 16:56:56 from Brett Schwarz <brett_schwarz(at)yahoo(dot)com>       2002-04-16 19:24:50 from Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com>       2002-04-17 07:42:53 from Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>        2002-04-18 05:06:19 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>    2002-03-29 17:48:40 from "Steve Wolfe" <steve(at)iboats(dot)com>  2002-03-28 21:20:40 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>   2002-03-28 21:35:10 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>    2002-03-28 21:37:33 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>   2002-04-18 02:38:37 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>    2002-04-18 02:43:23 from Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Lists:	pgsql-general

In response to

• Java as PG Procedural Language at 2002-04-16 13:51:45 from tom dyson

Responses

• Re: Java as PG Procedural Language at 2002-04-18 05:06:19 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-general by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	bombadil	2002-04-17 08:18:51	Making a column not null
Previous Message	pgsql-gen Newsgroup (@Basebeans.com)	2002-04-17 07:25:01	Poor performance with "large" table.