Re: date_in function

From: Dragos Manzateanu <dragon(at)mail(dot)dntis(dot)ro>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: date_in function
Date: 2002-04-17 05:48:56
Message-ID: 200204170543.g3H5hS203685@mail.dntis.ro
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 16 April 2002 10:32 pm, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 April 2002 05:48 pm, you wrote:
> > I want to change the date from a field in a tuple in a trigger_function
> >
> > create table example (
> > my_date datetime
> > ...
> > );
> >
> > int na;
> > char select[20];
> >
> > na = SPI_fnumber(trigdata->tg_relation->rd_att, "my_date");
> > memset(select, 0, sizeof(select));
> > sprintf(select, "1/1/2002");
> > newval = DirectFunctionCall1(date_in, CStringGetDatum(select));
> > rettuple = SPI_modifytuple(trigdata->tg_relation, rettuple, 1, &na,
> > &newval, NULL);
> > if(rettuple == NULL) elog(ERROR, "my_function: %d returned by
> > SPI_modifytuple", SPI_result);
> >
> > when i test that my server goes down. What I missed ?
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
> Not my function is about, but date_in.
> Have anybody worked with these ?
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2002-04-17 05:51:18 Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-17 05:42:34 Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE