From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Testers needed ... |
Date: | 2002-04-17 00:19:20 |
Message-ID: | 20020416201920.4fc6bf42.alvherre@atentus.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
En Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:41:19 -0300 (ADT)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> escribió:
> Could some ppl test out archives.postgresql.org and let me know if they
> notice any differences in speed?
Well, it's impressive.
One thing I don't like about archives.postgresql.org is that when it
show results for a search, in the space supposedly dedicated to showing
some lines of every result it always shows the header added in the
archive version of mail, i.e.
1.Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments [2]
Search for: Results per page: 10 20 50 Search for: Whole word Beginning Ending Substring Output format: Long Short URL Search through: Entire site PgSQL - Admin PgSQL - Announce PgSQL - Bugs PgSQL - Committers PgSQL - Cygwin PgSQL - Docs...
* http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/1999-10/msg00153.php (text/html) Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:23:56 EDT, 10351 bytes
This "Search for: (etc)" serves no purpose... what about making it skip
the first constant lines of HTML so it can show useful stuff?
Also, why isn't pgsql-patches in the list?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
Si no sabes adonde vas, es muy probable que acabes en otra parte.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-04-17 03:27:49 | Re: Mass-Data question |
Previous Message | Dmitry Tkach | 2002-04-17 00:11:21 | Re: Large table update/vacuum PLEASE HELP! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Loftis | 2002-04-17 00:22:41 | Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-04-17 00:03:41 | Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch |