| From: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Testers needed ... |
| Date: | 2002-04-16 18:06:01 |
| Message-ID: | 200204161806.g3GI61k11875@saturn.janwieck.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> [...]
> Oh, and, of course, its running on v7.2.1 now, which means that VACUUMs no
> longer lock up the search ... last night, I had something like 367
> indexers pounding away at the database *and* a VACUUM running *and* did a
> search in <2 minutes (considering that is 367 simultaneous and active
> connections to the database, I'm impressed) ...
Who said PostgreSQL doesn't scale?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Tkach | 2002-04-16 18:11:33 | Re: Large table update/vacuum PLEASE HELP! |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Tkach | 2002-04-16 17:27:54 | Re: how to assign primary key or unique constraint to pre-existing index? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fernando Nasser | 2002-04-16 18:27:17 | Re: Operators and schemas |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-16 17:55:41 | Re: Scanner performance (was Re: 7.3 schedule) |