From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: default values for views |
Date: | 2002-04-15 23:06:18 |
Message-ID: | 200204152306.g3FN6Ia03940@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
> "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> > > The attached patch allows views to have default values. You can't
> > > specify a default value within a CREATE VIEW statement, it must be
> > > done using ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... SET DEFAULT after the
> > > view has already been created. Most of the hard work was done by
> > > Tom Lane, I just patched pg_dump and updated the documentation.
> >
> > I am confused. I didn't think we could insert into views. Can we?
>
> No, but you can if you create a rule to handle the insertion for you
> properly.
>
> There is more discussion of this patch on -hackers, in the thread
> "rules and default values".
Oh, so somehow this patch interacts with the rule insertion code to
handle it. OK.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2002-04-15 23:16:07 | Re: Alter/update large tables - VERRRY annoying behaviour! |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-04-15 23:03:55 | Re: default values for views |