| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? |
| Date: | 2002-04-13 14:34:09 |
| Message-ID: | 200204131434.g3DEY9Y22053@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Having seen zero reports of any numeric
> > failures since we installed it, and seeing it takes >10x times longer
> > than the other tests, I think it should be paired back. Do we really
> > need 10 tests of each complex function? I think one would do the trick.
>
> A good point tho, I didn't submit a regression test that tries to ALTER 3
> different non-existent tables to check for failures - one test was enough...
That was my point. Is there much value in testing each function ten
times. Anyway, seems only I care so I will drop it.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-13 15:29:45 | Re: DROP COLUMN (was RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate) |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-04-13 13:32:38 | Re: 7.3 schedule |